Sexual mutilation and the moral order (problematics and basic concepts of the struggle against sexual mutilation)

French Lecture – transcript – reads like an academic paper. Points out double standards between genders, and examines possible correlations between cutting cultures and violence (wars, death penalty, female excision).

 

Abstract: The gender concepts of female (FGM) and male (MGM) sexual mutilation set up sexes the one against the other instead of bringing them together in defence of minors. Indeed, they ignore the fact that sexual mutilation strikes minors, not adults. This because their promoters seem ignoring that the object of sexual mutilation is subjection of minors through repression of autosexuality. The basis of this ignorance is the taboo weighing upon the specific organs of autosexuality, which are destroyed by sexual mutilation. We shall give a definition of sexual mutilation, designate its agent: the moral order, qualify its means: the repression of autosexuality, and point at its consequences: discrimination and segregation under threat of exclusion of opponents.

The worst of allegedly educational violence, sexual mutilation rites set up the law of might through terrorizing the human person at the age when they are the most vulnerable. Barbarian methods of banning infantile sexuality and of denying the right to pleasure, possessory markings exert a perverse sway of the group over the helpless individual in order to force them to work, reproduction and war. Vexatious, it humiliates through condemning personal pleasure by the castration of its specific organs. It frequently makes sexuality painful for women and severely impoverishes autosexuality for men. The atrocious pain, the terror of the operation and the permanent reminder of the related threats of castration, exclusion and death deeply traumatize, the most often unconsciously. So, it is one of the most obnoxious techniques of enslaving the individual, responsible for virulent fanati-cism and violence. Pretending to socialize through warranting a warranted-by-God-in-person moral value but destroying human identity in its most intimate part, its illusory superiority discriminates foreigners and opponents through an artificial racism.

Click for full article: Sexual mutilation and the moral order

conclusions
Violence against the child leads to a violent adult …
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s